221![19 Pennsylvania Pennsylvania ranked 19th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, moving up one spot compared to 19 Pennsylvania Pennsylvania ranked 19th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, moving up one spot compared to](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/dc269dd19a6dc59e6c9fdefb07455cc6.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:51
|
---|
222![39 Kansas Kansas tied for 39th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, rising six spots compared to 2012 and earning a 39 Kansas Kansas tied for 39th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, rising six spots compared to 2012 and earning a](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/aead32ff5e32b857bb733350a212c309.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:09
|
---|
223![44 Louisiana Louisiana tied for 44th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, a slight drop compared to[removed]Thought the 44 Louisiana Louisiana tied for 44th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, a slight drop compared to[removed]Thought the](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/2ac5703619fcb788dff066bb374d9ce2.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:11
|
---|
224![39 Alabama Alabama tied for 39th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, a slight increase from its position 39 Alabama Alabama tied for 39th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, a slight increase from its position](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/0e8abcc20e5c1b98495fd843d4da4bf6.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:00:53
|
---|
225![47 Mississippi Mississippi tied for 47th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, moving up four spots compared 47 Mississippi Mississippi tied for 47th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, moving up four spots compared](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/990a93b823af2be95582fba3ebd92ca7.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:24
|
---|
226![21 New Hampshire New Hampshire ranked 21st in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, dropping three spots compared 21 New Hampshire New Hampshire ranked 21st in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, dropping three spots compared](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/c92823e86b0ec048b7b7e21ae37bce6f.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:47
|
---|
227![1 Massachusetts Massachusetts ranked 1st in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, maintaining its leadership position for 1 Massachusetts Massachusetts ranked 1st in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, maintaining its leadership position for](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/e9d5b1697dd681468aea0b3696becb8b.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:18
|
---|
228![Microsoft Word - Transcript.doc Microsoft Word - Transcript.doc](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/d3cf2a2234813efcf82dae3856d7cfb8.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.energycodes.govLanguage: English - Date: 2011-09-14 16:10:46
|
---|
229![30 District of Columbia The District of Columbia ranked 30th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, a slight drop compared to 30 District of Columbia The District of Columbia ranked 30th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, a slight drop compared to](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/c12fba99f7f6e58343bbf02197fe9718.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:00:59
|
---|
230![Certificate_Energy_Performance_7.indd Certificate_Energy_Performance_7.indd](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/1f36516f3d51b633dac6b3a8430959c8.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.energystar.govLanguage: English - Date: 2012-11-11 18:17:07
|
---|